Forecasters See Lower Growth in 2026

The near-term outlook for the U.S. economy looks weaker now than it did three months ago, according to 33 forecasters surveyed by the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia. The forecasters predict the economy will grow at an annual rate of 2.1 percent this quarter, unchanged from the prediction in the last survey. However, the panelists see lower growth in each of the next three quarters. On an annual-average over annual-average basis, the forecasters expect real GDP to expand 2.2 percent in 2026, down 0.3 percentage point from the estimate in the previous survey.

A nearly unchanged path for the unemployment rate accompanies the outlook for growth. The forecasters predict the unemployment rate will increase from 4.4 percent this quarter to 4.5 percent in the first quarter of 2027. These projections are very similar to those from the survey of three months ago. On an annual-average basis, the forecasters expect the unemployment rate to average from 4.4 percent to 4.5 percent over each of the next four years. These annual projections also align closely with the previous survey.

On the employment front, the forecasters predict job gains in the current quarter at a rate of 68,900 per month, which is slightly higher than the previous estimate. However, the employment projections for the following three quarters show downward revisions from those of the previous survey. Additionally, the projections for the annual-average level of nonfarm payroll employment suggest job gains at a monthly rate of 34,600 in 2026 and 64,400 in 2027, both lower than the previous estimates. (These annual-average projections are computed as the year-to-year change in the annual-average level of nonfarm payroll employment, converted to a monthly rate.)

Median Forecasts for Selected Variables in the Current and Previous Surveys

  Real GDP (%) Unemployment Rate (%) Payrolls (000s/month)
Previous New Previous New Previous New
Quarterly data:
2026:Q2 2.1 2.1 4.5 4.4 67.1 68.9
2026:Q3 2.3 2.2 4.5 4.5 74.9 61.2
2026:Q4 2.0 1.6 4.5 4.5 75.1 58.4
2027:Q1 2.2 1.9 4.4 4.5 80.0 64.0
2027:Q2 N.A. 1.9 N.A. 4.5 N.A. 97.3
Annual data (projections are based on annual-average levels):
2026 2.5 2.2 4.5 4.4 48.5 34.6
2027 2.1 1.9 4.4 4.5 87.2 64.4
2028 2.1 2.2 4.4 4.4 N.A. N.A.
2029 1.9 2.3 4.4 4.4 N.A. N.A.

The charts below provide some insight into the degree of uncertainty the forecasters have about their projections for the rate of growth in the annual-average level of real GDP. Each chart presents the forecasters’ previous and current estimates of the probability that growth will fall into each of 11 ranges. Notably, the forecasters have lowered their estimates of the probability that real GDP growth will be 2.5 percent or higher in 2026.

The forecasters’ density projections for unemployment, shown below, shed light on uncertainty about the labor market over the next four years. Each chart presents the forecasters’ current and previous estimates of the probability that unemployment will fall into each of 10 ranges. The current unemployment rate probability projections for the next four years are little changed compared with the previous estimates.

Forecasters See Higher Inflation in 2026

The forecasters expect current-quarter headline CPI inflation will average 6.0 percent at an annual rate, up from their prediction of 2.7 percent in the previous survey. Core CPI inflation over the current quarter will also be higher at an annual rate of 3.2 percent, up from the previous estimate of 2.8 percent. The predictions for current-quarter headline PCE and core PCE inflation are also higher compared with their predictions in the last survey.

Measured on a fourth-quarter over fourth-quarter basis, headline CPI and core CPI inflation in 2026 are expected to average 3.5 percent and 2.9 percent, respectively, up from the previous estimates of 2.6 percent. In 2027 and 2028, these inflation measures are little changed compared with their predictions in the previous survey.

Over the next 10 years, 2026 to 2035, the forecasters predict headline CPI inflation will be an annual-average rate of 2.40 percent. The corresponding estimate for 10-year annual-average PCE inflation is 2.22 percent. These 10-year projections are 0.10 percentage point and 0.02 percentage point, respectively, higher than those from the previous survey.

Median Short-Run and Long-Run Projections for Inflation (Annualized Percentage Points)

  Headline CPI Core CPI Headline PCE Core PCE
Previous Current Previous Current Previous Current Previous Current
Quarterly
2026:Q2 2.7 6.0 2.8 3.2 2.7 4.5 2.7 3.4
2026:Q3 2.6 3.0 2.6 2.9 2.5 3.0 2.5 2.9
2026:Q4 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.7 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.6
2027:Q1 2.4 2.5 2.5 2.7 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.6
2027:Q2 N.A. 2.4 N.A. 2.5 N.A. 2.3 N.A. 2.4
 
Q4/Q4 Annual Averages
2026 2.6 3.5 2.6 2.9 2.7 3.6 2.7 3.3
2027 2.5 2.5 2.5 2.6 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.4
2028 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1
 
Long-Term Annual Averages
2026-2030 2.40 2.60 N.A. N.A. 2.20 2.48 N.A. N.A.
2026-2035 2.30 2.40 N.A. N.A. 2.20 2.22 N.A. N.A.

The charts below show the median projections (the red line) and the associated interquartile ranges (gray areas around the red line) for 10-year annual-average CPI and PCE inflation. The charts provide historical perspective on the current survey’s higher projection for 10-year CPI inflation and nearly unchanged projection for 10-year PCE inflation.

The figures below show the probabilities that the forecasters are assigning to each of 10 possible ranges for fourth-quarter over fourth-quarter core PCE inflation in 2026 and 2027. Notably, for both years, the forecasters have raised their estimates for the probability that core PCE inflation will be 3.0 percent or higher, compared with their predictions in the last survey.

Higher Risk of a Contraction in Real GDP in the Second Half of 2026

The forecasters see the risk of a contraction in real GDP this quarter at 17.9 percent, down from the previous estimate of 20.9 percent. However, they have increased their probability estimates for negative growth for the following three quarters, compared with their estimates in the survey of three months ago.

Risk of a Negative Quarter (%)
Survey Means

Quarterly data: Previous New
2026:Q2 20.9 17.9
2026:Q3 21.9 25.1
2026:Q4 22.7 24.5
2027:Q1 23.6 25.7
2027:Q2 N.A. 23.0

Technical Notes

Moody's Aaa and Baa Historical Rates

The historical values of Moody's Aaa and Baa rates are proprietary and, therefore, not available in the data files on the Bank’s website or on the tables that accompany the survey’s complete write-up in the PDF.

Missing Historical Values

Due to the federal government shutdown, we had incomplete historical monthly data available for the October 2025 unemployment rate and the CPI. We computed 2026 Q1 (for CPI inflation and core CPI inflation) and the full year of 2025 (for unemployment rate, CPI inflation, and core CPI inflation) historical values using interpolated October values available from Haver Analytics and provided these jump-off values to the panelists on the survey questionnaire. The panelists were permitted to use their own historical values. Some panelists used their own values; others did not.

The Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia thanks the following forecasters for their participation in recent surveys:

William Adams, Fifth Third Commercial Bank; Ed Al-Hussainy and Alexander Spitz, Columbia Threadneedle Investments; Scott Anderson and Doug Porter, BMO Capital Markets; Robert J. Barbera, Johns Hopkins University Center for Financial Economics; Peter Bernstein, RCF Economic and Financial Consulting, Inc.; Wayne Best and Michael Brown, Visa, Inc.; Seth Carpenter, Morgan Stanley; Gary Ciminero, CFA, GLC Financial Economics; Grant Collins, AIM Research, LLC; Andrew Davis, Bryn Mawr Trust; Rajeev Dhawan, Georgia State University; James Egelhof, BNP Paribas; Gabriel Ehrlich, Daniil Manaenkov, and Yinuo Zhang, RSQE, University of Michigan; Michael R. Englund, Action Economics, LLC; Tani Fukui and Shan Ahmed, MetLife Investment Management; Sacha Gelfer, Bentley University; James Glassman, Independent Economist; Ben Herzon and Patrick Newport, S&P Global Market Intelligence; Steve Kihm, Citizens Utility Board of Wisconsin; Yaniv Konchitchki, University of California, Berkeley; Thomas Lam, Independent Economist (Singapore); Matthew Luzzetti, Deutsche Bank; Brian Martin, Australia New Zealand Bank (ANZ); Robert McNab, Old Dominion University; Daniel Mershon, USAA; R. Anthony Metz, Pareto Optimal Economics, LLC; R. M. Monaco, TitanRM; Joel L. Naroff, Naroff Economics, LLC; Brendon Ogmundson, BC Real Estate Association; Panos N. Patatoukas, U.C. Berkeley, Haas School of Business; Michael Pearce, Oxford Economics USA, Inc.; Perc Pineda, Ph.D., Plastics Industry Association; Jason Prole, Capital Risk Management; Tim Quinlan, Wells Fargo; Luciano Rispoli, Advance Macro Research; Michael Roberts and Dan Roberts, Roberts Capital Advisors, LLC; Parker Ross, Arch Capital Group; Philip Rothman, East Carolina University; Allen Sinai and Noah Moudarres, Decision Economics, Inc.; Sean Snaith, University of Central Florida; Daniel Soques, University of North Carolina Wilmington; Stephen Stanley, Santander US Capital Markets; Charles Steindel, Editor, NABE Business Economics; Susan M. Sterne, Economic Analysis Associates, Inc.; Jordan Vickers and Maira Trimble, Eaton Corporation; Mark Zandi, Moody’s Analytics.

This is a partial list of participants. We also thank those who wish to remain anonymous.

Return to the main page for the Survey of Professional Forecasters.