The primary data source for estimates presented in this tool is the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS) Public Use Microdata Sample (PUMS), accessed via the Minnesota Population Center IPUMS-USA database (IPUMS-USA, University of Minnesota, www.ipums.org). For areas with 200,000 or more renter households, single-year ACS PUMS files (2010, 2015) were used to generate estimates. For those areas with fewer than 200,000 renter households, the five-year ACS PUMS files were used (2006–2010, 2011–2015). See Methodology for details.
Please address any questions or comments about this data tool to Eileen Divringi (Eileen.Divringi@phil.frb.org).
Renter income category
Calculated for renter households based on the relationship of the household’s income to the regional median family income (MFI):
Contract rent plus tenant-paid utilities such as electricity, gas, water, sewer, and fuel for heating the home.2
Calculated as the share of renter households for which gross rent was >30 percent of the monthly household income.
Severe cost burden
Calculated as the share of renter households for which gross rent was >50 percent of the monthly household income.
Median rent gap
The rent gap is calculated as the difference between a cost-burdened household’s maximum affordable rent (30 percent of the monthly household income) and their reported gross rent. Median rent gaps are calculated based on all cost-burdened households in each income category.
Surplus/deficit of affordable and available rental units
A unit is considered affordable if gross rent did not exceed 30 percent of the monthly household income at the given income threshold, adjusted for number of rooms (see Methodology for details). A unit is available if it is either vacant or currently occupied by a household at or below the given income threshold. The surplus/deficit is calculated as the total number of rental units that were affordable and available at a given income level minus the total number of renter households at or below that corresponding income level.
Affordable and available units per 100 renter households
Calculated as the number of rental units that were affordable and available to households at or below a given income threshold per 100 households at or below that income level.
Vacant rental units by affordability category
Calculated as the share of total vacant units that were affordable to renters in each income category.
Cost-burdened, lower-income household
A renter household for which income was ≤80 percent of the regional MFI and gross rent was >30 percent of monthly income.
Calculated as the share of all individuals in cost-burdened, lower-income households in racial/ethnic categories. Race categories exclude those who identified their ethnicity as Hispanic; the Hispanic category includes individuals of any race.
Calculated as the share of all individuals in cost-burdened, lower-income households that falls within each age category. Unrounded percentages sum to 100.
Calculated as the share of all cost-burdened, lower-income households that falls within each household type category. Unrounded percentages sum to 100.
Share of households cost-burdened, selected vulnerable subgroups
Calculated as the share of all renter households in selected vulnerable groups for which gross rent was >30 percent of monthly household income:
Individual 18 to 65 years old; not enrolled in school.
Number of employed persons
Calculated as the number of individuals in cost-burdened, lower-income households who reported being employed at time of survey. Includes those employed part time.
Current employment status
Calculated as the share of working-age adults in cost-burdened, lower-income households by employment status at time of survey.
Prior year employment status
Calculated as the share of working-age adults in cost-burdened, lower-income households by employment status during 12 months prior to survey:
Calculated as the share of individuals 25 years or older in cost-burdened, lower-income households by highest level of education completed.
All dollar figures are in 2015 dollars.
Two changes to the methodology for determining gross rents and household income categories preclude direct comparison of these estimates to those of prior reports released by the Philadelphia Fed’s Community Development Studies & Education Department. First, beginning with this update, utility costs for vacant units are imputed based on the median utility costs of similarly sized units. Second, households reporting zero or negative income that paid more than the Fair Market Rent (as defined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development) for their unit during the survey year were reclassified as “not lower-income” since their income situation was assumed to be either temporary or not indicative of broader economic hardship.
To adjust for PUMA boundaries that were discontinuous with MSA boundaries, Cecil County, MD, is excluded from estimates for the Philadelphia–Camden–Wilmington MSA, and Green County, PA, is included in estimates for the Pittsburgh MSA.
To read about the details of the methodology used in this analysis, click here.